Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Around 15:00 on July 18, 2018, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the case, such as intimidation against the above court 201, the Busan District Court Western Branch 201, the Busan District Court 7-7, Busan Gangseo-gu, Busan District Court 201, the Busan District Court 2011, the High Court 97B.
On August 9, 2017, the Defendant answer to the question of “I am at risk, I am unable to see,” and answer to the question of “I am at risk, face,” “I am at risk,” and answer to the question of “I am at risk, face,” “I am at risk, I am at risk, I am at the seat of the Defendant.” The Defendant answer to the question of “I am at risk, I am at the seat, I am at the seat of the police itself,” and “I am at risk, I am at the seat of the police itself. I am at the time of the instant case.”
However, at around 11:20 on August 9, 2017, the Defendant appeared in front of the Da apartment Edong, Busan, and the Defendant appeared in the vision of B while taking a bath to C, notified the Defendant’s mobile phone number and resident number front of the Defendant’s mobile phone number to G, who was called to the scene, and “B was present with a desire or intimidation to C.” On September 15, 2017, the Defendant received telephone from the police officer on the phone and expressed the desire to “B to have a hump, dog, shot, and humbly killed,” and the dump was not human beings, and the 4 complex is considered to be a same-sex. It means that “The age of the welfare center is about the age, the year, and the year.”
Accordingly, the defendant made a false testimony contrary to his memory and issued a perjury.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. A copy of the oath of the 2018 High Court Decision A, and a copy of the transcript of the witness examination of the witness A of the 2018 High Court Decision A, 97.