logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.01.31 2017고단8220
위증
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] Defendant A and Defendant B were sentenced to six years of imprisonment on October 19, 2017 to the violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) at Suwon District Court on April 24, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 26, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

1. On September 26, 2017, Defendant A appeared in the court of Suwon District Court No. 108 located in Suwon-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, which was located in the source of Suwon-si, and took an oath as a witness of the above case in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud) against Defendant B of the above court, and became to testify before the presiding judge No. 15th of the above court.

From January 1, 2015, the Defendant conspired with the above Defendant B, and sold the Dogs produced in the modern world to the victim E in collusion with the above Defendant B, as if the Defendant directly discovered the Dogs produced in the modern world, or as if Dogs themselves were the rare Chinese curios that participated in the excavation work, and there was no fact that B sold his Dogs to the Defendant.

Nevertheless, the Defendant acknowledged the fact that the witness participated from February 6, 2015 to September in the above court, and from January 1 to September.

2.6.A statement to the effect that B, alone, sold his own intention until before relocation.

The answer to the question, “e.g.,” and the prosecutor’s “F, etc., sold the Dog himself to the victim with Defendant B at the time of sale.”

“I do not have any question.”

The answer to "," and the prosecutor's "not later than two months" is required to determine whether there is no indication as such.

The answer to the question, “e.g.,” and the Prosecutor’s “B office in the F office and B office in the G building before” is not related to the witness.

The answer to the question, “e.g.,” and the prosecutor’s “a witness” has been engaged in the business with B in connection with his own sale.

“I shall not answer the question.”

The answer to “B”, and “B Defendant shall be 50:50 via the testimony.

arrow