logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.05.19 2017고정454
위증
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

At the 16:00 on October 11, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the case of occupational embezzlement against the above court 2016 Godan 2528, J. B at the 104 district court located in Gwangju Dong-dong, Gwangju, Gwangju, the Defendant purchased the other cargo by the prosecutor (B), and there is a letter that the vehicle price is KRW 25 million on May 11, 2016, and the vehicle price is KRW 25 million.

I do not think of the question “I”.

We answer the question, “I cannot see,” and “I cannot see,” the question, “I do not see any thoughts or talks with them.”

We answer “A summary that, after entering into a verbal agreement to take over a vehicle of KRW 25 million in the currency with an investigative agency, we do not answer to the question “a summary that there is a fact that the witness paid KRW 16 million and the balance was called to have been repaid in the course of performing his work.”

1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1. 1.

We answer to the question, “for example,” and answer to the question, “for example,” “a witness who has not exchanged with an investigative agency,” “for example,” and answer to the question, “a witness who has not received a telephone from the prosecutor or the police,” and “for example, the question,” “for the accused case, in which the police or the prosecution has called to the witness” of the presiding judge, and “a witness who has called to the witness by the police or the prosecution in connection with the accused case.”

1. The Plaintiff responded to “......”

However, there was a fact that the Defendant had heard from B about the price of cargo vehicles, and had a telephone conversation with the police officer in charge of the instant case (C) around May 11, 2016 and May 20, 2016.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Partial statement of the protocol concerning the examination of the suspect against the defendant;

1. To describe a copy of the D's statement;

1. A copy of the indictment No. 17657, copy of each trial protocol, copy of a witness examination record against A, and witness examination of E.

arrow