A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] On August 9, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten months by imprisonment with prison labor at the Changwon District Court for a crime of false accusation, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on August 17, 2017.

[2] On July 22, 2016, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Defendant case, such as special intimidation, No. 1285 of the above court No. 2016, Jinwon District Court No. 126, Changwon District Court No. 1281, which was 681, in Changwon-si, Sungwon-si.

In the examination of the above case, the defendant was led to the fact that the defendant threatened C at the E office operated by Seongdong-gu, Sungwon-si, Changwon-si, Seoul, around 04:00 on the date of July 2013.

“At the risk of the prosecutor’s questioning.”

I did not.

The defendant responded to "," and the defendant did not have any threat to C as much as he saw C as he saw C.

I would like to refer “I would not.” to the question.

The answer to "A witness who intends to write a knife C with a knife and a knife C was attached."

Gags, not required.

The prosecutor’s question, “I do not have any example or example.”

I respond to "I confirm that there is a fact that the person who has made a statement threatens to threaten the knife and die of the knife in a factual confirmation."

이렇게 하신 건 뭡 니 까.” 라는 검사의 질문에 “ 예, 적은 것은 맞는데, 그 내용 설명은 제가 좀 드려도 됩니까.

At that time, I will look at the so-called so-called faring by the low-income federation at the time, and I will see the private person.

At that time, No. B was adjacent to C, if any, to C and B.

Therefore, it is not possible to do so so, and at that time, the proposal will live.

I would have become a private person.

The answer, “I do not have any such fact,” which is so called “I am this letter.”

The prosecutor’s question “,” is the case.

“The answer was made.”

However, the facts are as follows: (a) the Defendant gets excessive, and (b) as the Defendant changed to C.