Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is the branch D of the Korean Association of Public Transport Workers' Unions under the Korean Federation of Democratic Trade Unions.

On January 30, 2013, at around 15:58, the Defendant was gathered to participate in the National Democratic Labor Union Federation of Yongsan-gu Seoul, Yongsan-gu (USO), prior to the 15:58 U.S., in order to take part in the 1,300 plenary session, including approximately 1,30 participants of the assembly, who used two lanes from the place where the assembly was reported by the South Young-gu and the Seoul Station, and went into the room of the Korean Chamber of Commerce and Industry at around 17:00 on the same day while the Defendant moved into the way prior to the direction of the assembly, and moved into four lanes from the five lanes of the old Samsung Samsung-gu Samsung-gu, Samsung-gu, Seoul, to the end of 17:47 on the same day.

Accordingly, the defendant conspired with the participants in the assembly and interfered with traffic by land.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Investigation report (verification of a report on assembly and a performance report) and a copy of the report on outdoor assembly ( demonstration or demonstration), investigation report (Attachment of a suspect's documentary evidence and photograph, and a photograph of the flow of assembly);

1. Report on the status of information on January 30, 2013, and the route of driving on January 30, 2013;

1. Determination as to the defendant and defense counsel's assertion on the photographic materials of the assembly organizer

1. The alleged defendant is aware that he/she took part in the assembly and progress with the knowledge that he/she was lawfully reported.

There was no intention to interfere with general traffic, and there was no conspiracy with other participants to interfere with general traffic.

2. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by each of the above evidence, the Defendant, even though being aware that the process of assembly was exceeded the legally reported route, was driven by the Defendant, with the participants in the assembly, at least four lanes.