1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 22,473,600 for Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 4,000,000 for Plaintiff B; and (c) KRW 2,00,000 for Plaintiff C and Plaintiff D, respectively.

1. Establishment of liability for damages;

A. In fact, the defendant is the president of G Hospital located in the Gu F during the period of Manyang-si to the Gynanology medical specialist.

Plaintiff

A is a patient who was performed by the defendant, and the plaintiff B is the husband of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff D and the plaintiff C are the child of the plaintiff.

Plaintiff

A was diagnosed on September 23, 2013 as protruding a protruding signboard No. 4-5 in 198, which was diagnosed as protruding a protruding in 100,000.

Plaintiff

A around 13:00 on October 8, 2013, around 13:00, he/she received an operation from the Defendant, such as an scambling of a conical signboard under the general anesthesia, scambling, scambining, and scambining, using a scambin, etc.

(hereinafter “the instant surgery”). During the instant surgery, the Defendant attached to the outer part of the Plaintiff’s left side pathy, the electric tenant, “Bovie pate for the blood transfusion” (a machine that cuts tissues by using high-frequency electric energy, or gives a small bloodline, and makes a blood transfusion).

However, in the course of the operation, Plaintiff A suffered images on the part of the attachment of the above Bovilasp, and on October 30, 2013, Plaintiff A performed a skin transplant surgery that was transplanted on the image side by attempting to kill the part, but, after the operation, Plaintiff A left a string of 5.5 cm in its original form, and a chromosomes.

When using an electric tenant, it is necessary to accurately attach a plaque to the patient's body so that the patient in the operation does not have pictures, to completely remove the volatile drugs, and to pay attention to the low-air substance that generates the heat, etc.

In relation to the above surgery, the defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 3 million with regard to the crime of injury by occupational negligence, and the defendant raised an objection against this and the case of formal trial is under way.

[Grounds for recognition] A.2-8 Facts without dispute, entry of Gap's evidence, purport of the whole pleadings

B. Determination 1 by the Defendant is correct in the patient’s body so that the Plaintiff A does not have pictures on the part of the attachment of an electrical tenant installed during the instant surgery.