beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 14,527,337 as well as the Plaintiff’s annual rate of KRW 5% from October 16, 2012 to June 7, 2016.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. On September 22, 2012, the Plaintiff was subject to a traffic accident on the part of the Plaintiff, and the Defendant corporation was hospitalized in a comprehensive hospital operated by 966, Busan-dong, Busan-dong, Busan-dong (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”) and received treatment, and thus, the Plaintiff suffered from the Defendant hospital’s recommendation on October 12, 2012, following the Defendant hospital’s recommendation that the treatment needs to be conducted. On October 12, 2012, the Plaintiff took part in a high-frequency sectecopic scopical surgery (hereinafter “the instant operation”). After the operation, the Plaintiff took part in the instant scopic scopical scopical scopical scopical scopical scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic scopic sc
The instant surgery was carried out by attaching the Plaintiff’s plaque connected to the electric sponsor on the Plaintiff’s side side of the bridge, and accurately attaching the patient’s body to the patient’s body so that the patient in the process of the surgery can not be exposed to images, and then using a low voltage, etc. as possible, and then fixing it to an operating device or setting it into the electric sponsor in order to prevent leakage currents from occurring.
[Reasons] Facts without dispute; Gap 1 through 4, 7, and Eul 1 through 3 (including branch numbers); the result of the commission of physical examinations to the director of the human-made University Busan Hospital; the result of the commission of physical examinations to the director of the relevant court; the result of the commission of medical records appraisal to the director of the Seoul Hospital at the relevant time, the purport of the entire pleadings
B. As the Plaintiff did not pay due attention to the location of an underwater image in the process of the instant operation and incurred the Plaintiff’s images by performing the instant operation without paying due attention to the Plaintiff’s medical staff members affiliated with the Defendant Hospital, the Defendant corporation is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for the damages incurred by the Plaintiff due to the said negligence.
(c).