1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasons for the court's explanation concerning this case are the plaintiff's birth, which is contrary to the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 9 and 12, which are insufficient to recognize the plaintiff's assertion due to additional documents submitted by the court of first instance and the facts recognized by the court of first instance.

The testimony shall be rejected and the following parts shall be cited in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act, except for those parts used or added:

[Supplementary part] From 3th to 4th of the first instance judgment, the following shall be followed.

The plaintiff suffered damages that could not be recovered at all.

Therefore, Defendant B and C have a joint liability to compensate for the above damages, and Defendant Korea Licensed Real Estate Agent Association is obligated to compensate for the above damages jointly with Defendant B as a mutual aid business operator who entered into a mutual aid agreement with Defendant B, taking into account the Plaintiff’s negligence, it shall seek damages against the Defendants within the scope of the amount stated in the purport

Part 5 of the judgment of the first instance court, the "building of this case" in Part 11 of the judgment of the first instance shall be built into the "building of this case".

[Supplementary Parts] The 6th sentence of the first instance court's 4th sentence shall be added to the following.

The term "the first instance court" shall be added to the front of the "Witness" in the fourth letter of the decision of the first instance.

Part 4 of the decision of the first instance court shall add “B 6(Notice of Reasons for Non-prosecution)” in front of the argument in Part 16(3).

(5) In addition to the judgment of the first instance court, the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Defendant B, etc. as fraud, asserting that “(i) the instant violating building was either notified or not clearly notified that it was an illegal building, and (ii) the Plaintiff was issued or received lease deposit, monthly rent, facilities, and premiums by the Defendant B, etc. from the Gwangju District Prosecutors’ Office 2014-type and 6896.” However, the Prosecutor was suspected of being guilty on December 19, 2014 (Evidence of Evidence).