Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) who exceeds the money that orders payment under the following among the parts concerning counterclaims against the judgment of the court of first instance.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows, except for the addition or deletion of the following parts, and therefore, it is identical to the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, it is acceptable to accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary or written in addition] On Part 2 of the Decision of the Court of First Instance 14, the following shall be added to “the defendant,” and “the following:

Part 3, 17, and 18 of the judgment of the first instance shall be followed as follows.

C. However, in the gold punishment produced by the Plaintiff and supplied to the Defendant on March 24, 2012 (hereinafter “the gold punishment of this case”), the gold punishment produced by the Plaintiff had been manufactured differently from the design drawings, such as “NG” in the attached Form, and there were 23 military teams in excess of the permissible tolerances. On the same hand, the gold punishment of the first instance court 4 through 6, as follows.

The term "China Company"

In order to deliver to the company, the Chinese company discovered that there is a problem in the gold-type product produced by the above gold-type in the course of running the business after being supplied with the gold-type in this case, and requested the defendant to supplement the product. The defendant, however, failed to produce the gold-type product due to structural problems, which eventually led to the failure to produce the actual product. The defendant's assertion that the "this court" in Part 4, 7 of the judgment of the court of first instance was replaced by "the court of first instance" in Part 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance to "the court of first instance" and "the appraiser" in the front of "the court of first instance" is added. On the fourth, 4, 18 and 19 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "limited to the plaintiff's failure to comply with the judgment of the court of first instance" was added to "the basis of Article 68 of the Civil Act". On the fourth, 4, 21 to 25 of the judgment of the court of first instance, and the defendant notified the plaintiff's intention (the plaintiff's argument was without merit.