Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for eight months and by imprisonment for six months.

, however, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

1. 피고인 A의 모욕 피고인은 2014. 8. 12. 20:00경 울산 중구 C에 있는 D가 운영하는 E 유흥주점에서 회사 동료인 B, F와 함께 술을 마시고 술값을 지불하지 아니하고, 이에 울산중부경찰서 소속 피해자인 경사 G가 신고를 받고 출동하여 피고인 일행에게 술값 지불 의사를 확인하자, 피해자 G 등에게 “술값을 지불하지 않을테니 맘대로 하라.”라고 소리쳐 피해자가 피고인 일행을 사기죄로 현행범인으로 체포하려고 하자 위 D, B, F, 순경 H 등 출동경찰관 2명이 듣고 있는 자리에서 피해자에게 “개 좃같은 새끼야! 니 맘대로 해라, 씨발놈아!”라고 욕설하여 피해자를 모욕하였다.

2. Defendant A and B’s obstruction of the performance of official duties did not pay the alcohol value as above at the same date, time, and place as set forth in paragraph (1). Defendant A’s insult insulting G as seen above, thereby intending to arrest the Defendants in a flagrant offender committing fraud and insult, Defendant A had the chest of a slope G with a drinking slope, with a single fat, and with a hand, had the chest of a slope G’s chest, and Defendant B threatened Defendant B with the bet the bet of a slope.

Accordingly, the Defendants conspired to commit violence and intimidation, thereby hindering the police officer from performing his/her lawful duties in relation to the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol regarding F;

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to the complaint;

1. Article 136(1), Article 30 of the Criminal Act (a), Article 311 of the same Act (a point of obstructing the execution of public duties), Article 311 of the same Act (a point of insult) - Defendant B who choose to imprisonment: Articles 136(1) and 30 of the Criminal Act - Selection of imprisonment;

1. Defendant A from among concurrent crimes: The punishment provided for in the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is heavier;