logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.06.25 2014고단1809
업무방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than four months and a fine not exceeding 2,600,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2014 Highest 1809]

1. On August 27, 2014, from around 03:00 to around 04:40 of the same day, the Defendant interfered with the business of the victim’s restaurant business by force by leaving the victim E, who is the owner of the business after drinking alcohol from the “Dju” store in the Gu, and without any reason, not paying the drinking value.

2. The Defendant, at around 04:40 on the same day as the preceding paragraph, proposed that the police box G, who belongs to the police box of the police station, shall pay the drinking value and return home during the match that was dispatched to the site after receiving a report at the same place at around 04:40 on the same day, but did not comply with this, he left G to continuously take the place in the restaurant, and put G to the police station, stating that “the police officer sick him.”

Accordingly, G used to arrest the defendant as a flagrant offender in the crime of interference with business by assaulting him/her to face his/her face, walking his/her clothes and legs several times, etc., thereby hindering the legitimate execution of duties concerning the arrest of a police officer.

[2] On August 13, 2014, from around 00:10 to 01:00 on the same day, the Defendant: (a) threatened the victim with drinking at a restaurant operated by the victim I in Ansan-gu H without any justifiable reason; and (b) expressed a large interest to the police with the large interest of “ception. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. Mad. ] caused the disturbance to prevent customers from entering the relevant place; and (c) obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by force.

[2015, 130] On October 24, 2014, the Defendant: (a) within the Fababababababababababababa, which was under the jurisdiction of the court during Ansan-si on October 24, 2014; and (b) the Defendant’s denial of alcoholic beverages under the influence of alcohol must be carried out by the Defendant to the Fabababababa; and (c) the police officer, etc., who was on duty after being carried out by the Defendant

arrow