logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2020.01.14 2018구합76286
임원취임승인취소처분취소
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

Details of the disposition

K served as the president of M University established and operated by L (hereinafter referred to as “school juristic person”) from July 10, 2015 until a criminal final and conclusive judgment is rendered, as seen thereafter.

N From July 11, 2015 to July 7, 2017, while Plaintiff C from July 7, 2017 to the same year.

8. Before August 22, 201, Plaintiff A served as the chief director from August 23, 2017 to the cancellation of the approval of taking office.

Plaintiff

J is an auditor of a school juristic person, and the rest of the plaintiffs are directors.

From March 21, 2018 to April 28, 2018, the Defendant conducted a fact-finding survey on school juristic persons and MM universities. On April 9, 2018, the Defendant notified the school juristic persons of the results of the fact-finding survey as follows:

1. Inappropriate KK President's holding concurrent office as a university instructor holding concurrent office as a director of a university warning to fill any vacancy A, the content of the Plaintiff's land registration of the school juristic person, and improper KK President's holding concurrent office as a director of the board of directors for filling any vacancy B, and HG G G;

(a) Measures to status (the revocation of approval of taking office shall be separately taken);

(b)the president who is prosecuted for a criminal case by providing administrative measures or money and has been subject to heavy disciplinary action shall be released from his/her position;

2. M University;

A. On May 21, 2018, the Defendant notified the school juristic person of the following pointed out matters, requested correction, notified the Plaintiffs of the cancellation of the approval of taking office, and ordered the cancellation of the approval of taking office for the Plaintiffs, and notified the relevant person who failed to comply with the request for correction, and ordered the cancellation of the approval of taking office for the relevant person who failed to comply with the request for correction, and ordered the cancellation of the approval of taking office for the relevant person after the hearing, along with the pointed out that the approval of taking office for the relevant person who did not comply with the request for correction is impossible.

(hereinafter referred to as “instant appeal”) 1. On December 19, 2009, it is after the expiration of the term of office on December 19, 2009 by one auditor. Articles 20 and 21(5) of the Private School Act

arrow