logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2016. 05. 12. 선고 2016다209399 판결
체납자의 자신의 처에 대한 양도는 사해행위에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court 2015Na11333 ( October 21, 2016), Daejeon High Court

Title

assignment of the debtor's wife constitutes a fraudulent act

Summary

The plaintiff's appeal is without merit (the plaintiff's appeal is without merit)

Related statutes

Article 406 of the Civil Act

Cases

Supreme Court Decision 2016Da209399

Plaintiff-Appellee

Korea

Defendant-Appellant

Shoeuk-gu

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court 2015Na1133

Imposition of Judgment

May 12, 2016

The records of this case and the judgment below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but the appellant's grounds of appeal are examined.

The argument regarding the procedure of appeal does not include the reasons prescribed in the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure of Appeal.

The appeal shall be dismissed in accordance with section 5 of that Act. The appeal shall be dismissed.

The cost of appeal is assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

partnership.

arrow