logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 02. 23. 선고 2016두60256 판결
(심리불속행) 중복조사 해당여부 및 텔레마케터비용 필요경비 해당여부[일부국패]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Daejeon High Court-2016-Nu-10129 ( October 20, 2016)

Title

(C) If a duplicate investigation is conducted, and if the expenses of the youth terminal are necessary, the examination shall be conducted.

Summary

(C) In order to avoid heavy disciplinary action due to the summary of audit, it is not possible to conduct a tax investigation with the Plaintiff’s visit to request the submission of a revised tax return for the purpose of avoiding heavy disciplinary action. Even if the tax investigation is conducted, the third increase disposition is merely a correction of the initial error of taxation regardless of re-audit, and the expenses incurred in the youthter constitute necessary expenses of the transferred property.

Related statutes

Article 81-2 of the Income Tax Act

Cases

2016du60256 Global income and disposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

aa

Defendant-Appellee

Head of Busan District Tax Office

Judgment of the lower court

Daejeon High Court-2016-Nu-10129 ( October 20, 2016)

Imposition of Judgment

2017.023

Text

All appeals are dismissed.

Costs of appeal shall be borne by each party.

Judgment of the lower court

The records of both the Reasons for Appeal and the Reasons for Appeal were examined, but the Reasons for Appeal by the appellant

The argument regarding the procedure of appeal does not include the reasons prescribed in the subparagraphs of Article 4(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Procedure of Appeal.

The appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 5 of the same Act, since it is found that there is no reason or reason to do so;

It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.

arrow