logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2012.12.27 2012고단796 (1)
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(절도)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 7, 1983, the Defendant was subject to a disposition to protect a juvenile by larceny at the Seoul Eastern District Court of Seoul on August 28, 1984, and on August 28, 1984, the Seoul East Eastern District Court sentenced imprisonment with prison labor for a short term of 8 months, maximum of 10 months, maximum of 10 thousand won, a fine of 100,000 won, from the Daejeon District Court's official principal branch court on August 26, 1987, from the Daejeon District Court's official branch branch branch on April 20, 195 to a suspended sentence of 1 year, from the Suwon District Court's Sungnam branch for larceny, etc. on September 15, 2006, to a prison term of 1 year, from the Seoul East Eastern District Court to a night intrusion, etc., and from the Seoul Central District Court on April 8, 2009 to a one-year imprisonment with prison labor for larceny.

After that, on November 18, 2010, the Seoul Central District Court sentenced 8 months of imprisonment with prison labor for larceny and completed the execution of the sentence on February 7, 201 by the Seoul Central District Court.

"2012 Highest 796"

1. Embezzlements of lost possession;

A. On June 18, 201, at around 22:00 on June 18, 201, the Defendant acquired one gallon juS mobile phone at Samsung judo, the market value of which is equivalent to 900,000 won owned by the victim C lost in events near Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu.

The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

B. At around 22:30 on June 18, 201, the Defendant acquired one copy of the “BC Card” owned by E, the victim D lost from the 8 exit area in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu.

The Defendant did not take necessary procedures, such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.

2. Violation of the Aggravated Punishment Act;

A. The Defendant, around 17:00 on June 19, 201, operated by the Victim G located in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F, at H Y.

arrow