beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
The Korean physical card (No. 1) seized to the victim B shall be the welfare card.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On May 26, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment for a violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act at the Seoul Central District Court, etc., and completed the execution of the said sentence on October 31 of the same year.
[2019 Highest 1057]
1. Crimes related to the Kakao Card owned by the victim D;
A. At around 05:00 on January 3, 2019, the Defendant acquired one copy of the Kakao Card owned by the victim D’s male-friendly job offering E lost, in front of toilets located in the high-speed terminal station of Seoul subway No. 3, Seoul subway Line.
However, the defendant did not take necessary procedures such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.
B. On January 3, 2019, the Defendant in violation of the Specialized Credit Financial Business Act: (a) around 05:23, at the high speed terminal station of subway No. 3; and (b) above one.
to pay 1,200 won by using the Kakao Card owned by the victim at the same time and at the same place, and to begin boarding in the subway, the same year;
1. 5. At around 07:25, around 15, the 20,200 won was used in total over 15 times using the above physical card, such as the payment of 1,350 won by the same method in the red transit area of the subway No. 2.
Accordingly, the defendant used the lost debit card unlawfully.
2. Crimes related to the Cze Card of the Korean bank holding the victim B;
A. At around 23:00 on February 15, 2019, the Defendant: (a) obtained a copy of the Cream Card of the Bank owned by the victim B, from the floor of the platform platform of the Gangnam Station of Seoul subway 2; and (b) around February 15, 2019.
However, the defendant did not take necessary procedures such as returning the acquired property to the victim, but did so.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property that has been separated from the possession of the victim.
(b).