Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 3, 2012, the Defendant interfered with business: (a) around 23:20 on October 3, 2012, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s business by force, 30 minutes, including, without any justifiable reason, the victim D (here, 39 years of age) who is the cause of the occupation, “it shall be opened due to a bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of the bit of a bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the bit of the

2. After the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender and was transferred to the Criminal Party Office of the Seoul Yangcheon Police Station, the Defendant, who was in charge of the obstruction of performance of official duties, and the Defendant’s oral inquiry on all statements about the Defendant’s personal information, etc. was defective, the Defendant’s Dock E (ma, 40 years of age), referring to whether the police officer raised bitch bitch, fright, fright, fright, frighter, frighter, frighter, and frighter’s criminal face, “hicker is equal to that frighter, frighter, frighter, and frighter’s internal seat, and frighter frightered, and frighter frightered to the Defendant’s e-mail, around 01:53 on October 4, 2012, she exceeded the Defendant’s waiting and interfere with the police officer’s execution of duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness E;

1. Written statements prepared in D;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of damaged parts;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

(a) First point in its ruling: Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act;

(b) Point No. 2: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act;

2. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

3. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse.

4. As to the defense counsel's assertion under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the defendant's defense counsel is 'infinite due to traffic accidents around 2002.