2. The costs of the lawsuit are assessed against the defendant.

A. On August 7, 2006, the Plaintiff entered the Gun and was discharged from military service on February 14, 2007.

나. 원고는 전역 후 피고에게 2006. 9.경 신병훈련소에서 뜀뛰기를 하다가 허리를 삐 끗하여 추간판탈출증 등의 상해(이하 '이 사건 상이라 한다)를 입었다며 국가유공자 등록신청을 하였고, 2007. 4. 19. 보훈심사회의로부터 '요추간판 전위(L4-5, Lt)'를 공무 관련 상이로 인정받았으나, 2007. 6. 8. 피고로부터 국가유공자등록신청에 대하여 치료하면 호전 가능성이 크다는 이유로 등급기준미달 판정을 받았다.

C. On July 19, 201, the Plaintiff received 'Sechopathical L4, lap signboard-savinging, and post-compacting compact with the pain pain in the Busan Veterans Hospital.' On September 16, 201, the Plaintiff filed an application for a re-verification physical examination on September 16, 201, but on December 8, 201, the Plaintiff received a decision not meeting the requirements for official duties on the ground that it is difficult to recognize the proximate causal relation between the upper branch at the time of service.

D. After that, on October 30, 2012, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that the instant difference occurred while conducting physical training at the New Disease Training Center. Accordingly, on February 27, 2013, the Defendant rendered a decision on the non-conformity of the requirements for persons of distinguished service to the State and persons eligible for veteran’s compensation (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the instant difference did not have causation with the performance of official duties, etc.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, Eul evidence Nos. 4 through 9 (including paper numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the disposition is lawful;

A. The plaintiff's assertion

Since the difference in this case continued the difference that occurred during the military service, there is a proximate causal relation between military service and the difference in this case, the disposition of this case is unlawful.

(b) Fact of recognition;

1) 원고는 입대 후 1개월경인 2006. 9.경 뜀뛰기를 하던 중 허리를 삐끗하여, 국군 청평병원에서 2006. 11. 13. 요추간판 전위, 요추의 염좌 및 긴장 의증을 진단받아 물리치료를 받았고, 이후 2007. 1. 5.까지 같은 증상으로 통원치료를 받았다. 그러던 중 원고는 2007. 1. 4. 국군수도병원에서 요추부 CT 및 MRI 촬영을 하였고, 다음날인 2007. 1. 5.부터 국군청평병원에 입원하여 치료를 받았으며, 입원치료 중이던 2007. 1. 24. 현역복무부적합자로 판명된다는 의무조사 상신을 거쳐 2007. 2. 14, 의병전역하였다.

2) The Plaintiff did not receive medical examination and treatment with respect to the pre-incriminary autopsy. On the other hand, on October 10, 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed with a neutic disease and other obstacles, and the Plaintiff’s main care B was recognized as a neute escape certificate between the 4/5 of the nephan and the nephan, according to the record of “inceptioned beds,” and the Plaintiff’s main care was continuously recognized as a neute escape certificate between the ephando reference and the ephando, No. 4/5 of July 19, 201, and the ephandoary escape certificate was conducted (e.g., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the e., the f. the me...

3) Results of each physical examination on the head of the Seoul Hospital in the instant court’s netcheon University

- The RoI's Round escape certificate No. 4/5 of the RoI's 3 January 2007 and the medical pressure opinion from this result are confirmed.

-It is known that the causes of the thirical signboard escape certificate are complex, and the main causes of the stirical reason are the decline of the conical signboard, and in the case of the increase in accordance with the MRI on January 3, 2007, it is judged that a sudden increase in the number of conical signboards escape certificates occurred while the departure of the conical signboard is in progress.

- Pursuant to the opinion of RoI on May 9, 2007, severe nephical pressure based on the leapprophism No. 4/5 in accordance with the opinion of RoI is judged to be the same pathology as the disease's disease's disease's disease's disease's disease's disease's disease.

[Ground of recognition] The facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, Eul evidence 1, and Eul evidence 1 and 3, the result of physical appraisal of the head of the relevant court's Seoul Hospital, the purport of the whole pleadings

C. Determination

The term "disease in education and training or in the performance of duty (including illness in the line of duty)" referred to in Article 4 (1) 6 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State refers to the injury or disease of military personnel or police officer during education and training or in the performance of duty. Thus, in order to be different from the above provision, there should be a proximate causal relationship between education and training or in the performance of duty and the injury or disease. In order to be different from the above provision, there should be a proximate causal relationship between education and training or in the performance of duty and the injury or disease, and there should be a causal relationship between the existing disease and the injury or disease due to the overlapped education and training or in the performance of duty and in the event of the recurrence or aggravation of the existing disease due to the overlapped act of education and training or in the performance of duty (see Supreme Court Decision 2008Du14696, Aug. 11, 2008).

이 사건에 관하여 보건대, 앞서 인정한 사실 및 변론 전체의 취지에 의하여 알 수 있는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 ① 원고는 군 입대 전까지 허리와 관련된 진료나 치료를 받은 적이 전혀 없었는데, 입대 후 2006. 9.경 훈련에 참가하여 뜀뛰기 도중 허리를 삐 끗하여 추간판탈출증을 진단받았고 위 상이로 인하여 의병전역을 하게 된 점, ② 비록 추간판탈출증의 주된 원인이 추간판의 퇴행으로 알려져 있으나, 원고의 주치의 소견에 의하면 원고는 수핵탈출증의 원인이 군대생활 중에 발생한 것으로 보인다고 하는바, 설령 그 발병원인이 원고의 내재적 소인에 있거나 입대 전 이미 발병한 것이었다 하더라도 원고가 입대 이후 훈련과정 중 뜀뛰기로 추간판에 급격한 부담을 준 것으로 보이는 점, ③ 원고에 대한 신체감정의도 추간판 퇴행이 진행된 상태에서 훈련과정에서 급성적으로 추간판탈출증이 발생하였다는 의학적 소견을 제시하고 있는 점, ④ 원고는 의병전역 직후 이 사건 상이에 관한 국가유공자 등록신청을 하였으나 호전될 가능성이 있다는 의견에 따라 등급기준미달 판정을 받았으나 그 후 특별한 외상 등이 없었음에도 호전되지 않아서 수술까지 받은 후 재차 이 사건 신청에 이른 점 등을 종합하면, 원고의 이 사건 상이는 군 교육훈련 또는 직무수행으로 인하여 발생하였거나 기존의 질병이 교육훈련이나 직무수행으로 악화되었다고 봄이 상당하다.

3) Therefore, since a proximate causal relation is recognized between the Plaintiff’s service branch and the military service of the instant case, the instant disposition taken on a different premise is unlawful.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.

Judges Kim Gin-tae

Judges Yoon Dong-dong