1. The defendant shall pay to the plaintiff A KRW 1,247,050, KRW 1,039,209, and KRW 831,367, respectively.

Basic Facts

A. On September 13, 2006, the head of the Busan Metropolitan Government Maritime Authority (hereinafter “the head of the Maritime Authority”) issued a public announcement on the 41,977 square meters of the Seoul Maritime Transport Daegu E-gu, Busan Maritime Transport Co., Ltd. on September 13, 2006, “D Housing Redevelopment Improvement Zone Designation and Improvement Plan Public announcement” to the Busan Metropolitan City Maritime Transport Daegu

(hereinafter “instant public perusal and publication”). (b)

Since January 24, 2007, the above improvement zone was designated as G improvement zone by the Busan Metropolitan City public notice, and was changed to H on July 11, 2007 and I on August 15, 2012, respectively.

The head of the Shipping Unit shall, on February 15, 2013, grant the changed designation on February 20, 2013, the Defendant [the Defendant [the instant improvement project zone] on February 15, 2013 (the “D Housing Redevelopment Development and Improvement Project Association” (hereinafter referred to as the “Transfer Association”) approved on January 24, 2007, with respect to the 41,907 square meters of land in Busan Shipping Daegu, Busan High Court (hereinafter “instant improvement project zone”).

(2) On July 24, 2008, in a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the disposition of authorization to establish an association filed by a certain partner against the head of the shipping unit, the judgment confirming that the disposition of authorization to establish an association was null and void on July 24, 2008 on the ground that the “a summary of the design of a building to be constructed,” and the “a summary of expenses incurred in removing and constructing a building,” which are necessary matters to be stated in the written consent of the establishment of an association, were publically official (the Busan District Court Decision 2008Guhap1291), and the appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2008Nu3845) and the final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2009Du4845) were all dismissed, and later, the Defendant approved the housing redevelopment project implementation plan to the project implementer and announced it on February 20, 2013.

C. The Plaintiffs are tenants residing in the instant rearrangement project zone as follows.

1) On April 19, 2007, Plaintiff A leased 80.8 square meters (24 square meters from M in the name of his spouse) among the 1st floor of Busan Shipping Daegu K Housing in the instant improvement zone, located in the instant improvement zone, under the name of his spouse, L.