1. The defendant,

A. The Plaintiff A, B, C, D, and I respectively KRW 1,83,090, Plaintiff G, and H respectively, and each of them.

1. Basic facts

A. On September 13, 2006, the head of the Busan Metropolitan Government Maritime Authority (hereinafter “the head of the Maritime Authority”) issued a public announcement of the Busan Metropolitan City Maritime Transport Daegu L, 41,977 square meters in size 41,97,000 square meters, “the designation of the rearrangement zone for the redevelopment of housing and the public announcement of the plan for the maintenance and improvement of the K Housing Redevelopment

(hereinafter “instant public perusal and publication”). (b)

Since January 24, 2007, the above improvement zone was designated as N-ro rearrangement zone by the Busan Metropolitan City public notice, and was changed to P-ro on July 11, 2007, the Busan Metropolitan City public notice on July 11, 2007 and the Busan Metropolitan City public notice on August 15, 2012.

C. On February 15, 2013, the head of the Maritime Transport Unit: (a) the Defendant [the Defendant [the Defendant] on February 15, 2013, which obtained the authorization for the establishment of January 24, 2007, “K District Housing Redevelopment and Improvement Project Association” (hereinafter “Relocation Cooperative”)” as to the 41,907 square meters of the Busan Maritime Transport Daegu Q Man (hereinafter “instant rearrangement Project Zone”).

(2) On July 24, 2008, the court rendered a judgment to confirm that the disposition to establish an association was null and void on the ground that the “a summary of the design of a building to be constructed” and the “a rough amount of expenses required for the removal and new construction of a building,” which are necessary matters to be stated in the written consent of the establishment of an association in a lawsuit seeking confirmation of invalidity of the disposition to establish an association filed by a certain association member against the head of the marine transportation association (Supreme Court Decision 2008Guhap1291) and the appeal (Supreme Court Decision 2008Nu383) and the final appeal (Supreme Court Decision 20092Nu4845) were all dismissed, and later, the Defendant approved a housing redevelopment improvement project implementation plan for the project implementer, which was established on September 23, 2011, and announced it on February 20, 2013.

The Plaintiffs are tenants residing in each house located within the instant rearrangement project zone as follows.

1. On June 6, 2008, Plaintiff A leased 20 square meters from S, which is located in the instant improvement zone, Busan Shipping Daegu RR in the instant improvement zone. From June 4, 2008, Plaintiff A leased 20 square meters from S.