logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2013.10.08 2013고정139
상해
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of two million won, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of five hundred thousand won.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant B, around 15:00 on March 6, 2013, expressed his desire to report the victim A (the age of 67) who does not have a good reputation at the Gju located in the Gju located in the Gju located in Thai-si, and expressed his desire to do so. While having a dispute, Defendant B took a serious part of the victim’s face with his left hand and took the victim’s face.

As a result, the Defendant inflicted bodily injury on the victim, such as cerebral rupture, which requires medical treatment for about two weeks.

2. Defendant A, at the same date, at the same time and place as in the preceding paragraph, performed a dispute with the victim B (the age of 74) as above, and satisfyed with the victim’s left hand, and fatd the victim’s face.

As a result, the defendant suffered injury to the victim within the left-hand side of the need for medical treatment for about four weeks and the structural frame of the inner wall.

Summary of Evidence

1. The Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Legal statement of the witness H;

1. A’s legal statement (limited to the defendant B);

1. Some statements made by the Defendants in each police interrogation protocol

1. The police statement of H;

1. Each written diagnosis;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. The Defendants: Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment;

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Determination on Defendant B and the defense counsel’s assertion under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The argument that Defendant B was assaulted first by Defendant A, and the bones around the snow was laid down, and the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp of the cryp, and

2. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, the Defendants’ exercise of tangible power is one another in the situation where the time limit is set.

arrow