The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant charged with the instant charges was military apartment security guards B.

A. On November 3, 2017, at the conference room of the Simsan apartment management office B around 17:00, the Defendant of defamation: (a) notwithstanding the fact that the victim C, the director of the management office, D, accounting personnel E, etc. was receiving entertainment, even though the victim C, who was the director of the apartment management office, was not at fault; and (b) despite the fact that the victim C, the director of the management office, D, and the victim E received entertainment.

“.....”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

B. Around 10:48 on December 13, 2017, the Defendant insultd the victim on the ground that the victim C was not allowed to leave the Defendant’s hospital, and that the victim was not allowed to leave the hospital, the Defendant: (a) 10:48 on December 13, 2017; and (b) 10 years of bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch bitch,

C. Symna ba for a period of time up to the point of time.

C. 4 minutes of the bit of bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of a bit of farmland.

Accordingly, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim while the security guards F, G, management department D, etc. are heard.

2. Determination

(a) Applicable legal provisions: Articles 307(2) and 311 of the Criminal Act;

(b) A crime of non-violation of intention, a crime subject to prosecution on complaint: Article 312 (1) and (2) of the Criminal Act;

(c) Submission of a self-agreement on May 31, 2018;

(d) Judgment dismissing a public prosecution: Article 327 subparagraphs 5 and 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act;