The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.

1. The summary of the facts charged is that the Defendant, from November 2003 to September 201, 201, was serving as the Women’s Women’s Women’s Federation in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, and took overall charge of the work of women.

The Defendant, from November 2003 to June 15, 2009, embezzled 31 times the sum of the money owned by C Apartment Women’s Association totaling KRW 185,000,00,000, from around September 23, 2007 to around 50,000, in the office of the Women’s Association located in the above apartment complex, for the purchase of commemorative gift gift to the president of the apartment group and the US dollars members, while having been in custody of the Women’s Association funds that consist of support funds for the C Apartment Resident’s Council and the profits from its own events, etc.

2. The gist of the defendant's defense of the defendant is as shown in the annexed list of crimes in the case of this case the C Apartment Women's Association (hereinafter referred to as the "Mams Association of this case") fund as shown in the annexed list of crimes of this case (However, from January 2, 2008 to June 2008, from November 2008 to June 2008, F used the fund as the general duties of E, from November 1, 2008 to June 19, 2009, the person who received the total expenses from the date stated in the annexed list of crimes of this case is not D but E). As such, the defendant used the fund under the pretext of telephone fee support for the elderly's chairperson, etc., the bottle gift for the elderly's president, the sick bill for the members, the promotion of marriage to the members' family members, the purpose of the establishment of the Women's Association and the act of using the fund in accordance with the purpose of the establishment and the budget expenditure procedure of this case, it does not constitute an occupational embezzlement.

3. The term "the intention of unlawful acquisition in the crime of occupational embezzlement" means the intention of disposing of another person's property in breach of his/her occupational duty, such as in the case of his/her own possession, for the purpose of seeking the benefit of himself/herself or any third person

(See Supreme Court Decision 2010Do9871 Decided June 14, 2012). The Defendant’s female funds in this case.