logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2011. 02. 10. 선고 2010두22924 판결
(심리불속행) 공사용역 지급받을 시점을 유예하기로 한 경우 공사용역의 공급시기[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court 2010Nu5129 ( October 07, 2010)

Case Number of the previous trial

Cho High Court Decision 2009Du1574 (No. 24, 2009)

Title

(C) The time of supply for construction services, where the payment of construction services is deferred;

Summary

(C) The time of completion is the time of supply of the service, even if the payment for the service is paid at the time of the completion of the lawsuit.

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

Although all of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, the argument on the grounds of appeal by the appellant falls under Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed under Article 5 of the same Act. It is so decided as per Disposition

Reference materials.

If the grounds of final appeal are not included in the grounds of final appeal that make it appropriate for the court of final appeal to become a legal trial, such as matters concerning significant violations of Acts and subordinate statutes, etc., the system of final appeal does not continue to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal, and refers to the system of dismissing final appeal by judgment without continuing to proceed with the deliberation on the merits of the grounds of final appeal (see

arrow