logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2014.02.05 2013고정949
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.2 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2013 High Court Decision 949]

1. Around 16:00 on October 25, 2012, the Defendant: (a) destroyed the front glass (3m, 2m) equivalent to KRW 300,000,00 in the market value of the victim’s possession on the ground that he said the victim C was able to drink alcohol; (b) destroyed the victim’s walled by his refusal to do so; (c) destroyed the victim’s front glass (3m, 3m, 2m, 3m, 2m) at the bottom of the city, which is the victim’s ownership; and (d) unloaded the beer of approximately KRW 40,00,00 in the market value on the bottom of the beer; and (d) destroyed the beer of approximately KRW 20,00 in the market value by entering the room; and (d) destroyed the part of the beer of KRW 50,00 in the market

2. In the time and place specified in paragraph 1, the Defendant expressed the victim’s humna on the ground that the victim (at the time and place specified in paragraph 1, 47 years of age) was “I am, I am hynas, I am hynas. I am hynas? I am hynas? I am hynas? I am hynas? I am hynas? I am am hynas? I am.

[2013Gohap950] From around 23:5 on December 31, 2012 to around 00:05 on January 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) committed a theft by bringing about the number of hands-ons, which led to a total amount of KRW 5,600 in the market price of two bicycles (AYO TUM, KON CHGEA5) owned by a person who is unable to know the name that he was installed in a bicycle storage yard in Jeonjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City.

Summary of Evidence

[2013 High Court Decision 949]

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Photographs (2013 Go fixed950);

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. Seizure record and list;

1. Application of investigation reports (general Acts and subordinate statutes);

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 329 of each Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The order of provisional payment;

arrow