logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2017.09.14 2017고단248
절도
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On November 13, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to ten months of imprisonment with prison labor due to occupational embezzlement, etc. at the Jeonju District Court, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Jeonju prison on May 6, 2015.

[Criminal Facts]

1. Larceny;

A. On January 31, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed larceny, around 00:00 on January 31, 2017, the Defendant: (b) committed larceny with a cash of 5,000 won, which was kept in custody in the said place while putting the Defendant’s upper half of the car into the taxi, when she was parked on the road adjacent to the ASEAN parking lot located adjacent to the ASEAN 29, Hanjin-gu, Jinjin-gu, Hanjin-gu, Seoul; (c) when she came to a cab car owned by the victim B; and (d) when she was reported, she destroyed the Defendant’s upper half of the car in the taxi.

B. On February 1, 2017, the Defendant: (a) committed larceny, around February 1, 2017, at around 09:20, the Defendant: (b) fell under the E-cab car owned by the victim D, which was parked on the front road of Gyeongjin-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Jin-gu, Seoul Special Self-Governing Province 6-9; (c) and (d) opened a door in which the market price at which the Defendant was kept in his/her place is unknown; and (d) cut off with one resident registration certificate, one driver’s license, and four hundred and seventy thousand won in cash located on the wall.

2. The Defendant attempted larceny at around 00:00 on January 31, 2017, when he was parked in the Korean-style studio located in 49, Han-jin-gu, Hongjin-gu, Seoul Special Self-Governing Province, the Defendant destroyed the Defendant’s upper half of the body in the taxi, thereby destroying the first glass window on the part of the victim F, which was reported, and did not discover the Defendant’s upper half of the body in the taxi, but did not discover the fact.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Investigation report (to hear and record statements made by victims, B, and F);

1. Previous conviction: Application of a reply to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation report (Attachment of a copy of the judgment), and Acts and subordinate statutes concerning personal confinement;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act (the point of view) and Article 342 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts and the choice of punishment.

arrow