The appeal is dismissed.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case and the summary of the facts charged in the instant case changed at the lower court’s judgment are as follows: (a) the Defendant, without registering the automobile maintenance business, was engaged in the automobile maintenance business by installing a stamper (referring to a residential space for camping camping) in five freight cars from March 2013 to March 2014; and (b) changing the structure and devices of the automobile.

In regard to this, the lower court determined that ① the instant camping ground was set up at a canter on the truck’s loading side; the upper part of the instant camping ground was set at a distance of 15cc right and right and right and right and right and right and 50cc right behind the truck; the part used as a bed part of the upper part was set up in line with the upper part of the boarding space so that only a specific type of cargo vehicle can be loaded and used for the camping ground beyond the loading of the truck; ② it is not possible to enter the camping ground; ③ it is not possible to open the camping ground; ③ to separate the camping ground from the truck, it is sufficient for people to sit or enjoy; ③ to connect the camping ground to the campus; to move the truck to the front part by using a dong support stand; and the Defendant’s act of installing the instant truck with an electric vexing 1 vehicle maintenance business is difficult to easily start by using the electric vexing stand, and thus, the Defendant’s act of installing it is also difficult to see it as a truck driver’s’s work.