logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.11.15 2017고단6040
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal record] On October 21, 2016, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 4 million by a branch office of the Daejeon District Court of the Daejeon District Court due to a violation of road traffic laws (drinking driving), and on August 7, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating road traffic laws (drinking driving), and on September 5, 2017, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 3 million for a crime of violating road traffic laws (drinking driving), including the above two cases.

[Criminal facts]

1. On August 16, 2017, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving alcohol) and the Road Traffic Act (Non-licensed driving) without obtaining a driver’s license, and the Defendant driven a 2k-meter knife vehicle from the front side of the branch office of the Dong-dong department in charge of the emulation of emulation of the emulation of the emulation of the emulation of the emulation of the emulation of the emulation of the emulation of the emulation of the emulation to the front side of the C oil station in the same city.

As a result, the Defendant violated the prohibition on drinking at least twice, and again, driven the vehicle without obtaining a driver's license.

2. The Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act, forged the signature of the company, and signed the investigation at the time and place mentioned in paragraph (1). When the Defendant was subject to a request from the OOOO of the police station E District of the Seosung Dong-dong Police Station to verify personal information at the time of operating the previous Taekwondo Institute, the G resident registration number of the F who was a student of the private teaching institute at the time of operating the previous Taekwondo Institute was indicated as the Defendant’s resident registration number, and used the mobile phone during the above day and demanded the police officer to sign on the column for confirmation of the driver on the screen of the notice of penalty of the personal information device (PA). The Defendant stated that it was “F” and sent it through the police internal computer network, and continuously stated that it was “F” by the police officer to request the driver’s column for confirmation, and submitted it to the police officer.

Accordingly, the defendant uses the above F's resident registration number unlawfully.

arrow