Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 5, 2015, the Defendant is a person who has been notified of a summary order of a fine of KRW 100,000,000 for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the Seoul Western District Court on the grounds of a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking) at the Seoul Western District Court on July 26, 2016.
On October 12, 2017, around 02:25, the Defendant driven an E QM3 car while under the influence of alcohol content of 0.121% while under the influence of alcohol without a vehicle driver’s license from around 2km to around 565 in the same Gu.
2. On October 12, 2017, the Defendant: (a) at the F District of the Seoul Gangnam Police Station located in Gangnam-gu Seoul, Seoul, the Defendant: (b) controlled the suspicion of drinking alcohol without a license; (c) from the slope G belonging to the said District, the Defendant was required to sign the Defendant on the part of confirming the Defendant’s statement in the situation statement of the driver at home and in the voluntary accompanying consent form; (d) entered the name of the Defendant’s words “H” in the sex name; and (e) submitted it to the said G on that spot.
Accordingly, the defendant forged two copies of private documents on fact certification for the purpose of uttering, and held each of them.
3. On the same day as mentioned in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant: (a) at the department I department of the Gangnam Police Station I of the Gangnam Police Station around 03:30 on the same day; (b) voluntarily responded to the accompanying; and (c) was requested by J to present a driver’s license by the superintendent of the police station of the said I Department; (d) was under the name of the Commissioner General of the Seoul Regional Police Agency, the official document, as the Defendant was under the Defendant’s driver’s license; and (c) presented a Class 2 ordinary driver’
4. The Defendant, at the same time and time as set out in paragraph 3, presents H’s driver’s license to the Gyeong, as set out in paragraph 3, can be carried out from the above police officer who believed to be true.