The judgment of the court below is reversed.

Defendant

A Imprisonment with prison labor for one year, and for one year and six months, respectively.

evidence of seizure.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The punishment of Defendant A (one year of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) by the lower court is too unreasonable.

B. Defendant B (1) Of the instant facts charged against the Defendant claiming a misunderstanding of facts, the Defendant received money from A on February 15, 2014 with a request to purchase a phiphone, and provided part of phiphones purchased from P in accordance with the purpose of receiving a request for purchase of phiphones, and thus, was separately sold to A, and the lower court found the Defendant guilty of this part of the facts charged. (2) The lower court erred by misapprehending the legal principles on the grounds that the Defendant’s punishment of unfair sentencing (one year and six months of imprisonment, confiscation, and collection) is too unreasonable.

2. On February 14, 2014, part of the facts charged [Defendant A's crime] paragraph (3) of the part of the indictment No. 2014 high-speed 257 is to be determined ex officio. The defendant issued to B the 1.2 million won of the opon, and then received approximately three gram of the opon from the Daejeon High-speed Bus Terminal on February 15, 2014, which was sent from B to Busan High-speed Bus Cargo, with approximately three grams of the opon, and purchased the opon.” (Defendant B's crime) Paragraph (1) of the part of the indictment is to be "the defendant purchased the 1.3 opon on February 14, 2014 with the 2.5 opon on the 1.5 gopon on the Popon on the 2.5 gopon on the 1,500,000 won of the opon on the 2.5 gopon on the opon.