logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.06.21 2017고정989
업무상과실장물취득
Text

Defendant

A A shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3 million, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5 million.

The above fines are imposed by the Defendants.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Defendant A is a person engaged in the trade of household appliances with the trade name of “D” in Daegu North-gu, Daegu-gu, and is engaged in the trade of household appliances.

A. around 07:00 on March 16, 2017, the Defendant purchased three air conditioners, which he stolen from E, from the above “D”.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the trade of used home appliances, has a duty of care to confirm the personal information of E and describe the acquisition of the personal information of E, and to verify whether it is stolen or not.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above care and neglected the judgment on the stolen water, thereby failing to verify E’s identification card, thereby purchasing three air conditioners out of 90,000 won in large volume.

B. On March 23, 2017, around 08:00, the Defendant purchased four air conditioners, which he stolen from E, from “D”.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the trade of used home appliances, has a duty of care to confirm the personal information of E and describe the acquisition of the personal information of E, and to verify whether it is stolen or not.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected the above care and neglected the judgment on the stolen water, thereby failing to verify E’s identification card, thereby purchasing four out of 120,000 won a large sum of 120,000 won.

(c)

Around 08:00 on March 24, 2017, the Defendant purchased three air conditioners and three air conditioners that he stolen from E.

In such cases, the defendant, who is engaged in the trade of used home appliances, has a duty of care to confirm the personal information of E and describe the acquisition of the personal information of E, and to verify whether it is stolen or not.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to pay the above attention.

arrow