logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.01.19 2017고정1317
업무상과실장물취득
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 11, 2017, the Defendant is a person engaged in the sale of bicycles with the trade name called “D” in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jongno-gu, and is engaged in the sale of bicycles.

On May 11, 2017, at around 16:00, the Defendant purchased one of the officially owned 900,000 won, which was the victim F that he stolen from E.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to verify whether a person engaged in the sale of bicycles is stolen by ascertaining the personal information of the seller and indicating the details of bicycle acquisition, motive for the sale, and the price at an appropriate price for the transaction price.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to make a judgment on the stolen water and purchased the same bicycle for 200,000 won by negligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by occupational negligence as above.

2. On May 20, 2017, the Defendant is a person engaged in the sale of bicycles with the trade name called “D” in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jongno-gu, and is engaged in the sale of bicycles.

Around 16:00 on May 20, 2017, the Defendant purchased one of the above “D” from the victim G, which he stolen from E, in an amount equivalent to KRW 500,000, in the market value of the victim G ownership.

In such cases, there was a duty of care to verify whether a person engaged in the sale of bicycles is stolen by ascertaining the personal information of the seller and indicating the details of bicycle acquisition, motive for the sale, and the price at an appropriate price for the transaction price.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected to make a judgment on the stolen water and purchased the same bicycle for 200,000 won by negligence.

Ultimately, the Defendant acquired stolen goods by occupational negligence as above.

3. In June 2017, the Defendant is a person engaged in the sale of bicycles on the trade name called “D” in Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Jongno-gu, and is engaged in the sale of bicycles.

The defendant.

arrow