logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2019.10.17.선고 2017다282704 판결
2017다282704정정보도,손해배상·2017다282711(병합)정정보도,손해배상·(병합)정정보도,손해배상
Cases

2017Da282704 Correction Report, Compensation for Damages

2017Da282711 (Consolidation) Correction Report, Compensation for Damages

2017Da282728 (Consolidation) Correction Report, Compensation for Damages

Plaintiff, Appellant

A person shall be appointed.

Law Firm Roon, Attorneys Oh Jeong-soo and Kang Jong-Un, Counsel for defendant-appellant-appellee

Defendant, Appellee

B A.

Law Firm Dongyang, Attorney Kim Young-il, Counsel for the plaintiff-appellant-appellee)

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2017 42036916, 201742036930 decided October 27, 2017

(Joint) 2017 42036923 (Joint) Judgment

Imposition of Judgment

October 17, 2019

Text

1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to the corrective report and claim for damages

On the grounds indicated in its reasoning, the lower court dismissed the Plaintiff’s claim for the corrective report based on the premise that the factual assertion stated in the article of this case is false, and the Defendant, on the ground that the posting of the article of this case for the public interest purpose of criticisming the social officer, citizens’ tax, and misleading, etc. of senior executives in the Ministry of Education, rejected the Plaintiff’s claim for damages by deeming that the above reporting act was not unlawful. Examining the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the rules of evidence or by misapprehending

2. As to the claim for a counterargument report

The lower court rejected the claim for the counterargument report of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning. Examining the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err in its judgment by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the claim for counterargument report as otherwise alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. Conclusion

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed, and the costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.

Justices Park Jae-young

Justices Park Sang-ok

Justices Noh Jeong-chul

Jeju High Court Decision 201No. 50

Justices Kim In-bok

arrow