1. The appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

The grounds of appeal are examined.

1. As to the claim for the corrective report and damages, the court below rejected the plaintiff's claim for the corrective report based on the premise that the factual assertion stated in the article of this case is false, and the defendant, based on the premise that the article of this case was published for the public interest purpose of criticisming the social officers, citizens' taxes, misjudgments, etc. of senior public officials in the Ministry of Education, it rejected the plaintiff's claim for damages

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the rules of evidence or by misapprehending the legal principles on the request for a corrective report, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

2. As to the claim for a counterargument report, the lower court rejected the claim for the counterargument report of this case on the grounds as indicated in its reasoning.

In light of the relevant legal principles and records, the lower court did not err by misapprehending the legal doctrine on the claim for a counterargument report, contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. The costs of appeal are assessed against the losing party. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.