1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff, in 2015, supported the Defendant’s new appointment of full-time teachers in the Seoul Education University’s sports education department B.

B. In order to select the above full-time faculty members, the Defendant selected the Plaintiff as the final three persons through document screening and phased screening (hereinafter “instant appointment screening”). However, on June 16, 2015, the Defendant notified the Plaintiff that the Plaintiff could not be selected as a candidate for teaching appointment (final successful candidates) on the ground that he/she could not be selected as a candidate for teaching appointment (final successful candidates).

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). / [Grounds for recognition] without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, Eul evidence No. 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. Facts 1) The instant appointment was supported by 24 members on the instant appointment process and the instant appointment process: (a) one of them was qualified (five examiners); and (b) two of the remainder was determined as disqualified by the basic review (in the outside review committee, 11).

B) As for the remaining 21 persons, the two-1-stage examination consisting of three examiners including C (10 points, 10 points, 7 internal examiners) and C (10 points, and 30 points and 11 of the review committee inside and outside of the country) as a result of the first-stage examination, five examiners including C (1 point in the first-stage 1) and the Plaintiff (3 point in the first-stage 1), and the second-1-stage examination consisting of “education research career examination (10 points, 7 inside examiners, 20 points, and 11 of the departments specialization examination (10 points, 20 points, 10 points and 20 points), and three examiners, including C (1) and the Plaintiff (2nd-stage 1) were selected as a first-stage examination (10 points and 11 second-stage 2) and the Plaintiff (2nd-stage 10 points, and the Plaintiff was a first-class 2-2 level examination.

Each stage of review.