logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.02.05 2012가합6390
손해배상(의)
Text

1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Defendant is a medical corporation operating the Ulsansan-gu medical corporation located in Ulsan-gu (hereinafter “Defendant hospital”), and the Plaintiff A was discovered as a birth male, and was used in the inn stairs on April 24, 2010, and was transferred to the Defendant hospital by the 119 rescue unit.

B. On April 24, 2010, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital: (a) taken the Plaintiff’s computer single-story photograph (limited to e-mail, e-mail (CT), and e-mail (hereinafter “CT photograph”); (b) as a result, found the Plaintiff’s e-mail and e-mail, e-mail and e-mail, etc.; (c) however, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital did not perform surgery, and provided the Plaintiff’s e-mail to keep the Plaintiff’s condition.

C. On May 3, 2010, the medical professionals at Defendant Hospital provided a preserved treatment, such as medication, and observed Plaintiff A’s clinical symptoms. As a result, Plaintiff A was found to blood species, cerebral species, and cerebral species, etc., on the ground that Plaintiff A’s food conditions are good, the medical professionals at Defendant Hospital maintained Plaintiff A’s condition while providing a preserved treatment only for the reason that Plaintiff A’s food conditions are good, and the operation was to be performed when the state of Plaintiff A worsens.

Plaintiff

On May 4, 2010, Plaintiff B, the wife of the Defendant Hospital, demanded all of the Plaintiff A to the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital. Accordingly, Plaintiff A transferred to Gyeongbuk University Hospital on the same day, but was transferred to Gyeongbuk University Hospital on the grounds that it is necessary to conduct surgery, and was re-issued to D Hospital, and was able to remove the blood species at D Hospital.

E. As a result of the operation, the status of Plaintiff A was temporarily improved, and thereafter, the Plaintiff A was placed in a state of disability, such as the paralysis, recognition disorder, and language impairment.

F. Meanwhile, while the plaintiff A was hospitalized in the defendant hospital, the status of the plaintiff A's consciousness, the degree of two copies expressed by the plaintiff A, and the seizure of the plaintiff A's blood is as shown in the attached Table.

[Grounds for recognition] The evidence No. 4 and No. 2 are each stated in the evidence No. 2.

arrow