logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2016.02.24 2015고단8864
사문서위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On August 16, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for a violation of the Act on the Promotion of the Game Industry at the Ulsan District Court on December 13, 2012, and completed the execution of the sentence at the Ulsan District Court on December 13, 2012. On June 26, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and two months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Busan District Court on December 4, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 4, 20

1. The Defendant, who committed the forgery of a private document and the uttering of a falsified document, received a loan from B by using the goods "before the new-solitary father" after reporting the marriage with C, and used it in installments.

A proposal was made on December 22, 2014, and around December 22, 2014, the defendant's women-friendly C's resident registration certificate from the defendant's women-friendly C was opened to B and issued with various documents necessary for the marriage report.

On December 23, 2014, the Defendant and B waiting in the Busan High-dong Office located in Busan High-gu Busan High-gu, Busan High-gu, and B entered the public service center of the above Gu office and stated “C’s seal prepared in advance on the part of the party to the marriage report prepared in advance,” and affixed C’s seal attached to C’s name and attached it to C’s name and submitted the above marriage report to the public service office of the above Gu office.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, has forged and exercised the marriage report in C without authority.

2. False entry and event such as public electronic records, the Defendant and B submitted a forged marriage report at the same time and place as above, which had not been married or intended to marry with B, and thereafter had the public official in charge, who is aware of the circumstance, recorded it as married with B and C in the same electronic record as the family relation register, and had the record kept.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with B, entered false facts in the official electronic records, and exercised the false official electronic records.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. B.

arrow