1. The Defendant: 10,000,000 won to Plaintiff B, and 5% per annum from November 30, 2016 to April 25, 2019, respectively.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The plaintiffs are married couple, and the defendant is the plaintiff B's model (the plaintiff A's model) and the non-party D is the plaintiff B and the defendant's father (the plaintiff A's model) due to the maintenance of the area of Thailand.

B. The Plaintiffs worked for approximately five years as Plaintiff A’s accounting, and Plaintiff B as an intermediate manager for about nine years, at the Jung-si operated by Plaintiff D.

C. The Defendant stated, from August 2016 to September 2016, that the Nonparty E, who worked for approximately 33 years as the driver of the Plaintiff A and D, was not in a bad wheels relationship. However, the Defendant said that “the two persons have winded................................” during the first police officer from around November 2016, 201, the Defendant referred the two persons to another person, who was on the last day of 2016, and that “Ne and sat are winded...... the inside and outside evidence is a file.”

On the other hand, the Defendant, around September 2016, expressed to the effect that the call between Nonparty F (E’s wife) and Nonparty G (Defendant’s wife) possessed by D was in an inhumanous relationship between the Plaintiff and Nonparty G (Defendant’s wife), and that the said call was in an inhumanous relationship between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff’s husband. The said call was in doubt of F’s inhumanity between E and the Plaintiff’s husband.

They thought that the plaintiff A and E were in in a bad faith relationship, and around that time they transferred the same contents to the non-party H et al.

E. Accordingly, D dismissed E on or around September 2016, and the Plaintiffs were not present at the due diligence from that time, and eventually retired from office by D.

F. The prosecutor of the Seo-gu District Public Prosecutor’s Office in Daejeon District Court was the Daejeon District Court Branch 2017Kadan628 against the Defendant.

A public prosecution was instituted on the grounds that the defendant had undermined the reputation of Plaintiff A by openly pointing out false facts as described in the claim. While the defendant denied it, the above court found the above criminal facts guilty on December 8, 2017, and sentenced the defendant to six months of imprisonment.

Accordingly, the defendant appealed to Daejeon District Court 2018No3, and the defendant.