logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2019.04.25 2018나68056
손해배상(기)
Text

1.The judgment of the first instance shall be modified as follows:

Defendant C and D jointly share to Plaintiff A with KRW 500,00,000,000.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff A is the father of the plaintiff B (2013) and the defendant D and C are the parents of the defendant E (2009 students, male).

(2) On April 1, 2017, Plaintiff B and Defendant E were playing in the F apartment Gdong complex located in Hanam-si on April 1, 2017, and Plaintiff A and Defendant C reported their respective children in the said playground.

(3) While Plaintiff B was going up with the slock play facilities installed in the above playground, Defendant E was slicking Plaintiff B’s her rear and her hand at two times his son’s rear and her hand (hereinafter “instant assault”), and Plaintiff B was in excess of the future.

(A) On 12:10 to 12:17, the above video CD No. 2 (hereinafter “instant video”). (4) The Plaintiff, who directly tested this Chapter, directly, asked Defendant E for the reasons that Defendant E would not have followed the following actions, and then, the Plaintiff C, who took part of Defendant E’s right shoulder and took part of Defendant E at approximately 3-4 meters away.

(5) The Plaintiffs asserted that Defendant E refused to go to Plaintiff B, and that Defendant E was at the time of the Plaintiff’s shoulder and the Plaintiff’s bridge once. In part 14:35 of the above film, Defendant E appears in the face that Defendant E was able to display the Plaintiff’s hand to Plaintiff B, but it is not clearly confirmed whether this is an assault or not). (5) Plaintiff A and Defendant C divided about five minutes of a five-minute dialogue.

Plaintiff

Unlike A, Defendant C and D, who did not directly witness the scene of the instant assault, confirmed the instant images through the apartment management office, and thought that Plaintiff A had led Defendant E to the suppression of excessive trees.

Accordingly, Defendant D asked Plaintiff A to walk a telephone around the day of the occurrence of the case, and Defendant D demanded Plaintiff A to go on the wind that Plaintiff A turns Defendant E with the wind that Defendant E was frighted, which caused Defendant E to play.

Defendant D.

arrow