1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiff A corresponding to the amount ordered to be paid below shall be revoked.

1. Basic facts

A. A. 1) D is a person who operates a refining in Thai-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, and the plaintiff B and the defendant are children of D, and the plaintiff A is the plaintiff's wife of the plaintiff B (the defendant's leader and D's leader) until September 2016. 2) The plaintiff A worked for about five years in the due diligence and about nine years in the middle manager in the due diligence operated by D from September 2016.

B. Defendant’s defamation 1) Although the Defendant worked for approximately 33 years as the chief in charge of D’s driver’s or the management of the above static court, the Defendant stated that, from August 2016 to September 2016, J, who worked as a staff member of the tax office between the first police officer and the Defendant, “E and the Plaintiff are in infinite relationship.” The Defendant stated that, on November 2016, K, who is a staff member of the lower police officer, referred to as “E and the Defendant, have winded.” (2) The Defendant stated that, around September 2016, F, who was the wife of D and the Defendant’s wife, were infinite relationship between the Plaintiff and the Defendant, and the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff were infinite relationship. The said monetary content was doubtful between the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff.

They thought that the plaintiff A and E were in in a bad relationship, and around that time they transferred the same contents to the z et al.

3) Around September 2016, D dismissed E, and the Plaintiffs were dismissed from office in the U.S., and they were dismissed from office by D. C. Criminal punishment 1 against the Defendant. On August 11, 2017, the Seo-gu District Public Prosecutor’s Office of Daejeon District Public Prosecutor’s Office filed a prosecution against the Defendant on the charge of impairing the Plaintiff’s reputation by pointing out false facts with respect to the Defendant, even though they are not in in in inhumanious relationship between E and Plaintiff A, with respect to the Defendant.

2) In a criminal trial pending in the Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court (Seoul District Court Decision 2017Ma628, Seosan Branch of the Daejeon District Court), the Defendant denied the crime.