beta
Text
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
Reasons
1. Summary of the facts charged
A. On October 11, 2012, around 17:42, the Defendant, at the entrance of the project team, installed, sited, or opened on the road for 23 minutes from October 18:05 of the same day, along with C&D, and with D, E, F, G, H, I, and I, at the site of the project team (hereinafter “instant construction”). In collusion with D, the Defendant interfered with the progress of construction vehicles, such as K affiliated with the J to enter the site for the instant construction, thereby hindering the victim L, M & Cooperative, which is the contractor, and N and P Co., Ltd., the subcontractor, by force.
B. On December 24, 2012, the Defendant was above the Defendant around 12:24.
In line with P, etc., it interfered with the work of the said contractor, subcontractor, and subcontractor by force by interfering with P, etc. by obstructing the progress of construction vehicles, such as R belonging to the “J” to enter the construction site for the instant construction project, by setting up waste lumber, stoves, and stoves on the road for nine minutes from 13:12 to 13:13 of the same day, and by installing and sitting on the road for one minute from 13:13 of the same day.
C. On December 26, 2012, the Defendant: (a) at the same place, E, T, U,V, W, X, Y, etc. on the road for 11 minutes from the 21:25th day to the 21:25th day, at the same place; (b) installed, sit, or sit on, waste timber, scrofs, chairs, and chairs on the road; (c) in collusion with E, etc., by obstructing the progress of construction vehicles, such as “Z” A” affiliated with “Z” to enter the construction site for the instant construction project; and (d) interfere with the construction work of the said contractor and subcontractor
The Defendant, at the same place around 20:58 on January 24, 2013, at the same time, installed, sited, or opened on the road for four minutes from the same day to 21:02 on the same day, and in the manner of dumping, the Defendant interfered with the progress of construction vehicles, such as AB, etc., affiliated with the “Z” to enter the construction site for the instant construction work, thereby obstructing the progress of construction vehicles, such as AB, etc., under which the Defendant intended to enter