logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2016.10.19 2016고단2473
공기호위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 19, 2014, the Defendant violated the Automobile Tax Act and the Automobile Management Act: (a) kept the front number plate of the Defendant’s CDamast van owned by the Defendant due to the failure to pay automobile tax and administrative fines; and (b) was unable to operate the said car, the Defendant was able to forge a motor vehicle registration number plate to continue to operate the said motor vehicle.

On May 20, 2016, the Defendant forged a motor vehicle registration number plate in air by entering “C” on the steel plate using white and green paint prepared in advance for the purpose of exercising at the site of apartment construction work in Seongdong-gu Seoul, Seongdong-gu, Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant forged the marks of public offices and forged the registration number plate for the purpose of exercising.

2. Around 16:30 on May 20, 2016, the Defendant violated the Franchising and Automobile Management Act (hereinafter “Franchising”) operated the Damming and Mamming vehicles with forged registration number plates attached, as prescribed in paragraph (1) at the Japan located in Seoul.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised forged air defense, and at the same time unlawfully used forged motor vehicle registration number plate.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder of Cdaas joints.

No automobile owner shall operate an automobile on the road on which no mandatory insurance has been subscribed.

Nevertheless, around 16:30 on May 20, 2016, the Defendant operated the said motor vehicle that was not covered by mandatory insurance on the roads near Sungdong-dong, Seongdong-gu, Seoul.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's legal statement (the third trial date);

1. Control report:

1. Records and lists of police seizure;

1. Mandatory insurance policies;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to vehicles and number plates photographs;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 238 (2) and (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts; Article 78 (2) and Article 71 (1) of the Automobile Management Act; Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

arrow