beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.
Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
On February 2, 2014, the Defendant: (a) around 13:07, at the victim D’s house located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju, 104 Dong 402, and (b) viewed the victim’s apartment door by putting the victim a door on the apartment door, and infringed on the victim’s residence without the victim’s permission.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on witness D's legal statement;
1. Relevant Article 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;
1. The portion not guilty under Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention in a workhouse;
1. Summary of this part of the facts charged
A. On February 2, 2014, around 13:07, the Defendant damaged the property by putting the victim at the victim D’s house located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, 104 Dong 402 with the phrase “the victim 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's '' on the apartment door. The Defendant destroyed the victim's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 's 70,000 's 's ' and 's 's
B. The Defendant, at the same time and time as above, committed assault against the victim by exposing kneee, prone, prone, prone, prone, prone, and prone, prone, prone, prone, and prone.
2. As evidence consistent with this part of the facts charged, there are various images of the witness D’s legal statement, the statement of the police interrogation protocol regarding D’s interrogation of the suspect, the victim’s prone, and prone photographs.
As indicated in the judgment at the time of the instant case, the Defendant was aware of the fact that the Defendant invadedd D’s residence, but the fact that damaged D’s property and that there was no assault against D, such as this part of the facts charged.
After all, the issues of this case are whether the credibility of the statements made by the victim D and the defendant can be recognized.
First, considering the attitude of D's legal statement, D is an objection.