logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2014.07.22 2014고단1417
폭행등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On October 31, 2013, at around 19:30 on October 31, 2013, the Defendant conducted a one-person demonstration with the content that “the first school student C (the age of 10) forced him to believe that he would cause the shot,” and deemed that he would be able to dispose of the demonstration goods together with his father D (the age of 51). I think that he criticizes the s of the above victims, and thought that he would be able to criticize the shot, such as “if he will conduct the shot, to believe that he will do so,” and that the above victims would be able to do so. Accordingly, the victim C took part in the 139-dong, Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Jongno-gu, Seoul, with the defect cited in reporting to 112, and caused the victim C’s flabing of the flab that caused it.

2. On November 1, 2013, the Defendant: (a) reported the victim C’s demonstration at the above place; and (b) instructed the victim C to believe that the victim’s demonstration was carried out by one person; and (c) assaulted the victims, such as drinking the victim C’s ma on one occasion; and (d) flabing the breath of the victim D’s flaps that the victim intended to restrain.

3. On November 4, 2013, the Defendant committed an assault against the victim, such as: (a) reporting the victim C’s demonstration at the above place; (b) taking the victim’s demonstration at one person; and (c) taking the victim’s face “at any time and at any time, she took the victim’s face; and (d) taking the victim’s handphones by a defect in order to take the victim’s photograph with a handphone.

4. The Defendant destroyed a mobile phone owned by the victim so that he can repair costs by putting the victim D’s cell phone off the floor by putting the victim’s cell phone in hand and cutting down the floor of the said victim’s cell phone by making it difficult for the Defendant to be arrested as a flagrant offender from the police officer called out after receiving a report of 112 at the date and time and place of the statement in paragraph (2).

Summary of Evidence

1. The legal statement of witness D and E;

1. The police of D. D.

arrow