logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2020.12.16 2020고단2918
공용물건손상등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 22:00 on September 10, 202, the Defendant damaged public goods to repair the backer at KRW 563,575 on the ground that, upon receiving 112 report, the Defendant was urged by the police officer D, etc. belonging to the police officer of the ASEAN Police Station, who was called out after receiving 112 to pay for the taxi expenses, the Defendant damaged the backer of the ASEAN Police Station, and the police officers called out after obtaining her recommendation by the police officer D, etc. to identify the Defendant’s personal information and contact details, and then, the police officers called out as her personal information and contact details, and caused them to have the backer of the said patrol twice by walking the backer part of the said patrol.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

2. At around 22:00 on September 10, 202, the Defendant was arrested as a flagrant offender for the crime of damaging public goods at the above location on the same grounds as Paragraph (1), and was taken to the C police box located in ASEAN, 22:04 on the same day, and was taken to the C police box located in ASEAN, and the Defendant was able to carry the c police box in front of the above patrol box, and the Defendant was able to carry the c police box in front of the above patrol box, and the Defendant d's chest was taken to take one time to walk the c police box belonging to the Busan Police Station C police box located in the Defendant's head, and assaulted the Defendant by walking the c police box at the left port once.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning the prevention of crimes by police officers and the maintenance of public peace and order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. 112 reported case handling table;

1. A written estimate;

1. Application of the relevant photographs and caps to the Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The defendant, on the grounds of sentencing of Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, exercises violence against police officers in the course of performing official duties under the influence of alcohol, and patrols.

arrow