logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.06.26 2012고단2158
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Criminal facts

[2012 Highest 2158] On September 9, 2012, the Defendant, without obtaining a driver’s license, was under the influence of 0.080% of blood alcohol concentration, and the Defendant was under the influence of 0.080% of blood alcohol concentration, and the Defendant was under the influence of driving Cpoter vehicles on the roads in front of the kidne market parking lot located in the kidne road at the kidne market at the kidne market at the kid speed.

In this case, a person engaged in driving service of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to properly operate the steering direction and brake system of the motor vehicle and to safely operate the motor vehicle.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in neglecting this and proceeding as it was, and was found to have received the part on the left side of the instant cargo vehicle after the left side of the victim D (the 22 years old) driving in the opposite direction.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as finites, requiring treatment for about two weeks by occupational negligence as above, and at the same time damaged the said car to have an amount equivalent to KRW 1,144,458, such as repair cost, such as pentine exchange.

【2013 Highest 246】 The Defendant driven a C Poter Cargo under the influence of alcohol content of 0.172% from the front day of the Yellow Dust, Seoul, Gangdong-gu, to the front day of the 12nd day of the Hannam City without obtaining a driver’s license on September 18, 2012. The Defendant driven a C Poter Cargo under the influence of alcohol content of about 200 meters.

【2013 Highest 966】 The Defendant was entrusted with the sale of clothing equivalent to KRW 10 million at the market price owned by the victim G in the logistics warehouse located in the Hanam-si F around June 2012.

After that, the Defendant sold the above clothing to an indeption customer, and kept 10 million won out of the sales proceeds for the victim, and embezzled it for personal use by the Defendant around that time.

[Judgment of the court below]

1. The name of a brokerage business for used goods shall be the accused in fraud;

arrow