Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On July 3, 2013, the Defendant driving a city bus around 10:40 on July 3, 2013, and continued to drive the Parisbrate prior to the extension of the Sinnam-si.

Since the location is an intersection with signal apparatus, the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to drive safely in accordance with the signals.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, while proceeding in violation of the signal, was driven by the victim D (Influent, 53 years old) driving on the left part of the E-mail that is driven by the victim D (Influent, 53 years old) from the room of the apartment in which the above intersection was driven by the e-mail to the right part front of the bus.

As a result, the Defendant suffered injury, such as minculating the bones of the boomed body in need of approximately eight weeks of treatment, due to the above occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A traffic accident report and a traffic accident report;

1. On-site photographs and field photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 3 (1) and proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, the selection of imprisonment without prison labor;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act only includes the details of the violation of signals and the one-time fine, the fact that the insurance was purchased, the agreement