logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.03.26 2013고단176
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(위험운전치사상)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date of the final judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 10, 207, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving) and the Road Traffic Act (Free License) by having the Seoul Western District Court rendered a summary order of KRW 1 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Western District Court, and on June 23, 2008, issued a summary order of KRW 3 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the Seoul Central District Court on June 23, 2008. On January 10, 2013, the Defendant again violated Article 14 (1) of the Road Traffic Act without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of the Seoul Western District Court at approximately 30km in front of the “Seongnam-si in the southnam-si, the Seoul Central District Court at around 00:52, the Defendant again violated Article 14 (1) of the Road Traffic Act without obtaining a driver’s license in the section of the vehicle under the influence of alcohol at around 1127-82.

2. The Defendant is a person engaged in driving the said vehicle. On January 10, 2013, the Defendant is a person who is in charge of driving the said vehicle. On the other hand, the Defendant was driving the said vehicle under the influence of alcohol at around 00:52 on January 10, 2013, while driving a four-lane road in front of the “Saeong-gu, Jyang-gu, Jyang-gu, Jyang-gu, Jyang-gu, Jyang-do, an apartment complex with a 16-lane area located in Pungyang-gu, Saeong-gu, Saak-si, an apartment complex with a view to 17-82. At the same time, the Defendant was at night and at the same time, at the intersection where traffic control is not performed, and thus, the Defendant engaged in driving service had a duty of care to reduce the speed and prevent the accident by maintaining the vehicle’s safety and driving the vehicle. However, the Defendant was negligent in driving under normal influence of drinking and neglected the two-lane signal at the center.

arrow