A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months and a fine not exceeding five million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Punishment of the crime

On May 23, 2016, the Defendant: (a) rented 1002, the Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government “B Building No. 1002; (b) advertised in the Internet site, including “C,” etc. from around that time to June 20, 2016; (c) introduced D, which is a Russia woman, from his/her name-based bromoer, and introduced them to the said officetel; (d) reported the advertisement to the said officetel; and (e) provided 150,000 won to the said officetel as the price for commercial sex acts, and directed Russia women D and sexual intercourse.

Accordingly, the defendant committed commercial sex acts such as arranging sexual traffic.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each protocol of suspect interrogation of the police to the accused, D, or E;

1. Article 19 (2) 1 and Article 24 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. (Concurrent Imposition of Imprisonment with prison labor and fines) concerning facts constituting an offense and Articles 19 (2) 1 and 24 of the same Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution. Article 62 (1) of the same Act on the grounds for sentencing specified below;

1. Article 62-2 (1) of the Criminal Act on the community service order;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order [the scope of recommendations] / [the grounds for the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act / [the scope of recommendations] 2 types of commercial sex acts subject to the age of 19 or older (the brokerage, etc. of commercial sex acts due to the business and the payment of prices) / [1-3 years] advertising or mediation by using a medium with high radio wave / [the decision of sentence] 0 defendant was sentenced to a fine around October 2009 due to the same crime of the same kind / the fine around November 201, the suspended sentence judgment on the probation on April 201, and the fine around April 2014, it was found that the defendant was subject to the punishment of the instant crime of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of the instant case of business for three days.

It is so decided as per the Disposition for the reasons above all the sentencing conditions, such as the defendant's age, sex, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime.