1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Defendants shall be revoked, and the Plaintiff’s revocation part shall be the Defendants.

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff was commissioned by the Governor of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province as E (hereinafter “E group”) from March 6, 2012 to March 5, 2014 by the Governor of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, and was reappointed and was working for from March 6, 2014 to March 5, 2016, and was not re-commissioned on March 5, 2016.

Until January 13, 2016, Defendant B and C worked for each of the heads of G and division in Jeju City by January 13, 2016, and were in charge of re-commissioning the Plaintiff, such as performance evaluation.

B. The Jeju Special Self-Governing Province H group (hereinafter “H group”) has the I group and E group. According to Article 11(2) of the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province Ordinance on the Establishment and Operation of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province H group (hereinafter “Do Ordinance on the Establishment of Do H group”), the Governor may evaluate F during the commission period of three months before the expiration of the commission period, and re-commissions after deliberation by the Steering Committee.

On September 27, 2011, Defendant Jeju Special Self-Governing Province enacted the “Performance Evaluation Guidelines (hereinafter “Performance Evaluation Guidelines”) in accordance with the said Ordinance on the Establishment and Operation of Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, in order to determine whether to re-commissions upon the expiration of the term of commission of the F in the H Group (I group and E group), which is in charge of operation at Jeju, and revised the said Performance Evaluation Guidelines on February 1, 2015.

The main contents of the amendment are to classify the musical evaluation from the musical evaluation to the musical evaluation, and to separately classify the musical evaluation from the musical evaluation.

The criteria for evaluation before and after the amendment are as shown in attached Table 1, and the main contents of the amended guidelines for performance evaluation (hereinafter referred to as the "Guidelines for Performance Evaluation") shall be as specified in attached Table 2.

C. Upon receipt of delegation from Defendant Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, the Jeju Special Self-Governing Province issued an official document stating that it conducted performance evaluation during the commissioning period to determine whether to re-commission the Plaintiff upon expiration of the commissioning period, and that it submitted performance evaluation documents, etc. to the Plaintiff on September 2, 2015.